
CLAT 2026 (UG) is now over, and attention has shifted from the examination hall to admission realities. Beyond scores and answer keys, students must understand candidate numbers, seat availability, NLUs accepting CLAT scores, domicile reservations, and the counselling process. This guide explains what truly matters after CLAT 2026 and how undergraduate admissions actually work.
The Consortium of National Law Universities (CNLUs) issued an official press release confirming the successful conduct of CLAT 2026 (Undergraduate). This notification is the formal starting point for understanding the post-exam phase, including answer keys, results, counselling, and admissions.
CLAT 2026 UG was conducted on a national scale, demonstrating the administrative and operational reach of the Consortium.
Key highlights from the notification:
The Consortium specifically acknowledged the cooperation of:
This confirmation is important because it rules out mass cancellations, large-scale technical failures, or administrative irregularities that could otherwise impact results.
Many aspirants underestimate the importance of the official post-exam notification. For CLAT UG candidates, this press release establishes:
From this point onward, the focus shifts entirely from preparation to interpretation, including:
This notification also sets the timeline for post-exam events.
As per the notification:
Only objections filed within this window and through the official mechanism are considered.
This step is particularly relevant for candidates near critical cut-off zones, where even a 0.25 or 0.50 mark change can significantly alter ranks.
Once the exam is done, the most critical question is not “How was the paper?”, but “How many candidates am I competing against?”
According to the official data released by the Consortium:
This means the actual number of candidates who appeared for the exam was extremely close to the total registrations.
Now compare the candidate pool with actual seat availability.
| Particulars | Numbers |
| UG candidates appeared | ~75,000 |
| Total UG seats (all NLUs) | ~4,092 |
| Students per seat | ~18–19 |
This ratio explains why:
After understanding how many candidates appeared, the next critical layer is how many seats actually exist and how those seats are divided. This is where most misconceptions about CLAT begin.
Across all participating NLUs, CLAT 2026 offers the following undergraduate seat structure:
| Seat Type | Number of Seats |
| Core CLAT UG Seats (regular intake) | 3,705 |
| Supernumerary Seats (NRI / FN / NRI Sponsored) | 247 |
| Other Special Category Seats | 140 |
| Total UG Seats Across NLUs | 4,092 |
However, this aggregate number can be misleading if not broken down properly.
The 3,705 core seats are the seats that are filled strictly through:
These seats form the real competition pool for the majority of Indian candidates.
Supernumerary seats are additional seats, over and above the sanctioned intake.
| Key Point | Explanation |
| Do supernumerary seats reduce general seats? | ❌ No |
| Are they counted in the CLAT rank list? | ✅ Yes |
| Do they have separate fees? | ✅ Significantly higher |
| Are most Indian students eligible? | ❌ No |
➡️ For most UG aspirants, these 247 seats do not materially reduce competition.
Apart from caste-based reservation, several NLUs allocate seats for specific socio-political or administrative groups, such as:
These seats further reduce the pool of open All India seats.
Let’s break this myth:
Once domicile and category reservations apply, the effective All India General seat pool shrinks drastically.
This is the most important structural section for aspirants. Every NLU differs in:
Below is a complete, non-selective list, not just “top NLUs”.
| NLU | UG Programme(s) | CLAT UG Seats |
| NLSIU Bengaluru | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 310 |
| NALSAR Hyderabad | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 132 |
| WBNUJS Kolkata | BA LL.B. (Hons.), BSc LL.B. (Hons.) | 108 + 50 |
| NLIU Bhopal | BA LL.B. (Hons.), BSc LL.B. (Cyber Security) | 116 + 59 |
| NLU Jodhpur | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 164 |
| HNLU Raipur | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 170 |
These NLUs usually close at very high ranks and are the most preference-heavy during counselling.
| NLU | UG Courses Offered | Total Seats |
| GNLU Gandhinagar | BA LL.B., BBA LL.B., BCom LL.B., BSc LL.B., BSW LL.B. (Hons.) | 172 |
| NLU Odisha (Cuttack) | BA LL.B. (Hons.), BBA LL.B. (Hons.) | 159 |
| NUSRL Ranchi | BA LL.B. (Hons.), BBA LL.B. (Hons.) | 180 |
| TNNLU Tiruchirappalli | BA LL.B. (Hons.), BCom LL.B. (Hons.) | 112 |
| MNLU Nagpur | BA LL.B., BA LL.B. (Adjudication), BBA LL.B. | 240 |
| MNLU Aurangabad | BA LL.B., BBA LL.B. | 120 |
These NLUs offer flexibility and allow candidates to:
| NLU | UG Course | Seats |
| RMLNLU Lucknow | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 169 |
| RGNUL Patiala | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 180 |
| CNLU Patna | BA LL.B. (Hons.), BBA LL.B. (Hons.) | 138 |
| DSNLU Visakhapatnam | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 120 |
| DBRANLU Sonipat | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 120 |
| DNLU Jabalpur | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 120 |
| RPNLU Prayagraj | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 60 |
| NLU Tripura | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 60 |
| NLUJA Assam | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 60 |
| NUALS Kochi | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 60 |
| HPNLU Shimla | BA LL.B., BBA LL.B. | 180 |
| GNLU Silvassa | BA LL.B. (Hons.) | 66 |
| IIULER Goa | BA LL.B., BBA LL.B. | 180 |
Despite lower rankings or smaller intakes, these NLUs are crucial buffers in counselling rounds.
State domicile reservation is one of the most decisive yet least understood aspects of CLAT UG admissions. Many admissions that appear “unexpected” are actually explained entirely by domicile quotas.
State domicile (also called state quota) refers to seats reserved for candidates who are permanent residents of the state where the NLU is located.
Key characteristics:
Domicile reservation exists to ensure that home-state students receive representation in their state’s public law university.
To understand the impact of state quota, it is important to compare it with caste-based reservation.
| Aspect | State Domicile | Caste-Based Reservation |
| Applies to | Home-state candidates | SC / ST / OBC / EWS |
| Reduces All India seats | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Cut-offs usually | Lower | Lower |
| Affects General category seats | ✅ Strongly | ✅ Strongly |
| Importance in counselling | Very high | Very high |
For General category candidates, domicile can be the difference between:
| NLU | State Quota % |
| NLSIU Bengaluru | 25% |
| NALSAR Hyderabad | 25% |
| WBNUJS Kolkata | 33% |
| NLIU Bhopal | 50% |
| NLU Jodhpur | 25% |
| HNLU Raipur | 50% |
| GNLU Gandhinagar | 25% |
| GNLU Silvassa | 25% |
| RMLNLU Lucknow | 45% |
| RGNUL Patiala | 10% |
| CNLU Patna | 50% |
| NUALS Kochi | 49% |
| NLU Odisha (Cuttack) | 25% |
| NUSRL Ranchi | 50% |
| NLUJA Assam | 50% |
| DSNLU Visakhapatnam | 48% |
| TNNLU Tiruchirappalli | 48% |
| MNLU Mumbai | 62% |
| MNLU Nagpur | 62% |
| MNLU Aurangabad | 62% |
| HPNLU Shimla | 25% |
| DNLU Jabalpur | 50% |
| DBRANLU Sonipat | 25% |
| NLU Tripura (Agartala) | 30% |
For candidates domiciled in:
the effective competition pool is almost halved.
Result: A Maharashtra domicile candidate is competing for more protected seats at MNLU than an All India candidate at NLSIU, despite NLSIU having triple the intake.
These mistakes often lead to avoidable counselling failures.
CLAT UG scores are not used only by NLUs. Several private and deemed universities accept CLAT scores either as:
Understanding this expands a candidate’s post-CLAT options significantly.
Not all candidates will:
Non-NLU institutions become important for:
| Institution | How CLAT Is Used |
| Jindal Global Law School (Sonipat) | CLAT-based shortlisting + interview |
| NMIMS School of Law | CLAT accepted |
| UPES School of Law (Dehradun) | CLAT score accepted |
| Alliance University (Bengaluru) | CLAT accepted |
| Bennett University (School of Law) | CLAT considered |
| MIT-WPU School of Law (Pune) | CLAT accepted |
| ICFAI Law Schools | CLAT accepted |
| IFIM Law School | CLAT considered |
| Presidency University (Bengaluru) | CLAT accepted |
| IUP School of Law | CLAT accepted |
| Aspect | NLUs | Non-NLUs |
| Centralised counselling | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Government funding | ✅ Mostly | ❌ No |
| Fees | Moderate | Often high |
| Admission flexibility | Limited | High |
| Interviews | Rare | Common |
Candidates must approach non-NLUs with clear expectations regarding:
Non-NLUs should not be seen as:
Many candidates:
After looking at candidates, seats, NLUs, domicile, and non-NLU options, the most important insight remains this:
In CLAT UG, no one competes for “total seats”.
Every candidate competes for a much smaller, filtered pool of seats.
This section explains how to calculate real competition using practical examples.
A common assumption among aspirants is:
This is incorrect because:
To understand competition for any NLU, apply this four-step method:
We now apply this method to real NLUs.
| Step | Breakdown |
| Total UG seats | 310 |
| Karnataka domicile quota (25%) | ~78 |
| All India seats | ~232 |
| General category share (~50%) | ~116 |
| Step | Breakdown |
| Total UG seats | 100 |
| Maharashtra domicile quota (62%) | ~62 |
| All India seats | ~38 |
| General category seats | ~19 |
This explains:
| Step | Breakdown |
| Total UG seats | 175 |
| MP domicile quota (50%) | ~88 |
| All India seats | ~87 |
| General category seats | ~43 |
For MP domicile candidates:
For a General candidate without domicile advantage:
This explains why:
CLAT 2026 UG is not just an entrance exam; it is a multi-layered admission system where rank, reservation, domicile, and preference logic interact continuously.
This final section consolidates everything discussed so far into clear interpretive guidance.