
The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial authority in the country. It has the final say on constitutional, civil, and criminal matters. But here’s a question that many law students, citizens, and even young advocates often ask: Can a Supreme Court judgement be overturned?
The simple answer is yes, but under certain conditions. Let’s explore how and when this can happen — along with real-life examples.
Article 141 of the Indian Constitution states that “the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India.”
This means:
But even though the Supreme Court’s decisions are binding, they are not immune to change. There are specific ways through which these judgements can be reviewed, reconsidered, or even overturned.
There are four primary ways a Supreme Court judgement can be overturned:
The Supreme Court has the power to review its own judgement. This is allowed under Article 137 of the Constitution.
Example: S. Nagaraj v. State of Karnataka (1993) – The Court stated that the power of review is not an appeal, but a safeguard against miscarriage of justice.
Introduced in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra (2002), a curative petition is the last legal remedy in India.
Example: Yakub Memon’s case – His curative petition was the final attempt before the execution of his death sentence.
Sometimes, a larger bench of the Supreme Court can overrule a previous decision made by a smaller bench.
This happens when:
Example:
In Puttaswamy case, Justice Chandrachud (writing for a plurality of four judges), Justice Nariman and Justice Kaul all categorically overruled ADM Jabalpur case. Their reason was that there were certain basic rights that were recognised by the Constitution, but not conferred by it.
Sometimes, if the legislature disagrees with the interpretation of a law or Constitution by the Supreme Court, it can amend the Constitution itself.
This doesn’t directly overturn the judgement, but changes the legal basis on which it was made.
Example:
Another example is:
No, overturning a Supreme Court judgement is rare and done with great caution. The Court itself follows the principle of stare decisis, which means “to stand by things decided”.
But the Court has also acknowledged that law evolves. So, where earlier decisions become outdated, unjust, or conflict with constitutional values, the Court has shown the willingness to correct itself.
Overruling a judgement is not a weakness. In fact, it shows that:
This keeps the Constitution alive and relevant.
| Method | Description | Example |
| Review Petition | Reconsideration by the same bench for limited reasons | S. Nagaraj v. State of Karnataka |
| Curative Petition | Final remedy to prevent gross miscarriage of justice | Yakub Memon Case |
| Larger Bench | A bigger bench overrules an earlier smaller bench decision | ADM Jabalpur overruled in Puttaswamy |
| Constitutional Amendment | Parliament changes law or Constitution to nullify effect | 93rd Amendment after Indira Sawhney case |
Yes, Supreme Court judgements can be overturned — but only under specific legal conditions and with great care.
This ensures that the integrity of justice is preserved while also keeping the legal system dynamic and responsive.
It’s a beautiful balance between finality and flexibility, where the highest court of the land can look back, learn, and lead with fairness.