Logical Reasoning Questions for CLAT | QB Set 11

It augurs well for the future that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has given the first authentic indication that the operation of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) may come to an end in the whole of the north-eastern region, if ongoing efforts to normalise the situation bear fruit. Mr. Modi’s remark that a good deal of work is being done in that direction, not only in Assam but also in Nagaland and Manipur, may be rooted in his keenness to demonstrate the level of progress achieved in the region under his regime; but it will bring immense relief to the citizens, nevertheless. Areas notified as ‘disturbed areas’ under AFSPA have been progressively reduced in the last few years, mainly due to the improvement in the security situation. About a month ago, the Union Home Ministry reduced such notified areas considerably in Assam, Nagaland and Manipur. There was a substantial reduction in Assam, where AFSPA was removed entirely in 23 districts and partially in one. In Nagaland, after the removal of the law from 15 police stations in seven districts, it remains in areas under 57 police stations, spread across 13 districts. Areas under 82 police stations are still notified under the Act in Manipur, even though 15 police station areas were excluded from the notification from April 1. Mr. Modi, who spoke at a ‘peace, unity and developmental rally’ in Diphu in Assam last week, cited “better administration” and the “return of peace” as the reasons for the removal of AFSPA in these areas in a region that has seen insurgencies for decades.

AFSPA was revoked in Tripura in 2015 and in Meghalaya in 2018. It is not unforeseeable that other States will also be excluded from its purview at some point of time. It is convenient to link the exclusion of an area from AFSPA’s purview with reduction in violence by armed groups, improvement in the security situation and an increase in development activity, but what is important is the recognition that the law created an atmosphere of impunity and led to the commission of excesses and atrocities. It was hardly four months ago that 15 civilians were killed in Mon district in Nagaland in a botched military operation. Therefore, alongside the gradual reduction in the areas under the Act, there should be serious efforts to promote justice for victims of past excesses too. On the political side, it is indeed true that much headway has been made in moving towards a political solution to some of the multifarious disputes in the region, in the form of peace accords, ceasefire and creation of sub-regional administrative arrangements. The removal of AFSPA from the entire region will be an inevitable step in the process. But irrespective of the security situation, AFSPA should not have allowed such impunity to the armed forces.

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial

1. In which of the following states is AFSPA still present?
(a) Tripura and Meghalaya
(b) Meghalaya and Assam
(c) Assam and Tripura
(d) Only Assam

2. According to the passage, which was the biggest problem of imposing AFSPA?
(a) It made the army violent.
(b) It offered blanket impunity to the military officers leading to atrocities.
(c) It increased the rate of crime.
(d) None of the above.

3. Which of the following is not the direct effect of the withdrawal of AFSPA?
(a) Reduction in violence by armed groups.
(b) Improvement in development activity.
(c) Increase in civil consciousness.
(d) All of the above

4. From the above passage which of the following cannot be assumed?
(a) The AFSPA did more harm than good.
(b) The AFSPA permitted the armed forces to kill civilians.
(c) The removal of AFSPA from the entire Northeast region is inevitable.
(d) None of the above.

5. From the above passage, which of the following statements cannot be inferred?
(a) The Union Home Ministry is in charge of the internal security of the citizens.
(b) Assam, Nagaland and Manipur are in the Northeast region of India.
(c) The political situation in the Northeast regions has deteriorated off late.
(d) All of the above.

Answers & Explanations

1. Ans. (d)
Sol. As mentioned in the above passage, AFSPA has been entirely removed from Tripura and Meghalaya and only Assam is the one which still has its presence. Therefore option (d) is correct.

2. Ans. (b)
Sol. As per the passage, the biggest problem is that it offered impunity to army officers. The Act in itself did not make the army violent and the act in itself did not increase the rate of criminal activity. Therefore it cannot be said that the AFSPA directly led to the same. However, the impunity was direct and therefore option (b) is the correct answer.

3. Ans. (c)
Sol. As mentioned in the paragraph, increase in civil consciousness is not a direct effect of the removal of AFSPA and therefore the same cannot be given. Options (a) and (b) are correct as per the passage and are direct effects of the removal of AFSPA. However, Option (c) though an indirect effect, is not stated in the passage. Therefore option (d) is incorrect too.

4. Ans. (b)
Sol. As seen from the above paragraph, it is not stated anywhere that the AFSPA permitted the AFSPA to kill civilians. The AFSPA gave impunity which is not the same as permitting the armed forces to kill and therefore Option (b) is the correct answer as it cannot be reasonably assumed. Options (a) and (c) can be reasonably assumed.

5. Ans. (c)
Sol. As seen from the above passage, Options (a) and (b) can be reasonably inferred. Option (c) is the correct answer as the same cannot be inferred from the above passage. The political situation has improved as the disputes have gone down and therefore it cannot be said that the political situation has deteriorated. Therefore option (d) is not correct.