How to Solve Logical Consistency Questions in CLAT: Strategies and Examples

Logical Consistency questions are a common component of law entrance exams like CLAT (Common Law Admission Test). These questions assess your ability to analyse arguments, identify contradictions and determine the validity of statements. 

In this guide, we will walk you through effective strategies to tackle Logical Consistency questions and provide examples to illustrate each approach.

1. Understand the Question Format

Logical Consistency questions usually present a set of statements or arguments. Your task is to evaluate whether these statements are logically consistent with each other or if there are any contradictions. You’ll need to determine if the given information can coexist without conflict.

2. Carefully Read and Analyse the Statements

Thoroughly read the provided statements or arguments. Pay attention to keywords, assumptions and any information that could lead to inconsistencies. Look for explicit contradictions or instances where the statements clash.

Legal Reasoning Question Bank

Example:

Statement 1: All cats have tails.

Statement 2: Some cats are tailless.

In this example, Statement 2 contradicts Statement 1, as it implies that there are cats without tails, while Statement 1 asserts that all cats have tails.

3. Identify Contradictions

If you identify any direct contradictions between statements, mark them as inconsistent. Contradictions reveal logical inconsistencies and can help you eliminate answer choices.

Example:

Statement 1: Freedom of speech is a fundamental right.

Statement 2: People should be restricted from expressing controversial opinions.

Here, the contradiction is evident. Statement 1 supports freedom of speech, while Statement 2 advocates for restrictions, leading to a logical inconsistency.

4. Apply the Principle of Exclusion

If one statement implies the exclusion of another, they cannot be logically consistent. Look for situations where the truth of one statement automatically negates the possibility of another being true.

Example:

Statement 1: The concert will be held indoors.

Statement 2: Attendees should bring sunscreen for the outdoor event.

Here, the logical inconsistency arises because the information in Statement 1 makes the possibility of an outdoor event (Statement 2) unlikely, if not impossible.

5. Examine the Scope of Statements

Evaluate whether the statements are making absolute claims or conditional ones. Absolute claims can lead to logical inconsistencies when they conflict with conditional statements.

Example:

Statement 1: Every student must take the math exam.

Statement 2: Students who choose the science track are exempt from math.

In this case, the inconsistency is subtle. Statement 1 asserts that all students must take the math exam, while Statement 2 introduces an exception for science track students.

6. Consider Counterexamples

Think about scenarios that would disprove the consistency of the statements. If you can find even one plausible scenario where the statements cannot coexist, they are likely inconsistent.

Example:

Statement 1: The meeting will take place on Monday.

Statement 2: The office will be closed for renovations on Monday.

Even though these statements might seem consistent at first glance, a counterexample would be an inconsistency. If the office is closed for renovations, the meeting cannot take place there on Monday.

7. Eliminate Answer Choices

After analysing the statements and identifying inconsistencies, eliminate answer choices that include those inconsistent statements. Choose the option that presents logically consistent information.

Example:

Which of the following sets of statements is logically consistent?

A) All birds fly. Some birds are flightless.

B) All birds fly. No birds can swim.

C) Some birds can’t swim. Some birds can’t fly.

In this example, option B can be eliminated because it contains a direct contradiction. Option A and C are both consistent as they don’t contain inherent contradictions.

Mastering Logical Consistency questions in CLAT requires a combination of careful analysis, critical thinking and a deep understanding of logical principles. Practice regularly with sample questions to hone your skills. By following the strategies outlined above and practicing with examples, you can confidently approach these questions during the exam and enhance your chances of success.


Calling all law aspirants!

Are you exhausted from constantly searching for study materials and question banks? Worry not!

With over 15,000 students already engaged, you definitely don't want to be left out.

Become a member of the most vibrant law aspirants community out there!

It’s FREE! Hurry!

Join our WhatsApp Groups (Click Here) and Telegram Channel (Click Here) today, and receive instant notifications.

Aishwarya Agrawal
Aishwarya Agrawal

Aishwarya is a gold medalist from Hidayatullah National Law University (2015-2020) and has over 9 years of experience in law. She has been mentoring law aspirants to help them secure admission to their dream colleges and universities.

Check out 1500+ Question Bank (Legal) for CLAT 2025, here.

JOIN OUR WHATSAPP COMMUNITY